D. Popko
To Win
J. L. R. D. Silva
To Win
Dmitry Popko vs Roberto Cid Subervi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W L W L
Form
L L W W W W W L W LH2H: Popko 2 - 0 Subervi
They have played 5 sets in total, with Popko winning 4 and Subervi winning 1. The last match between Popko and Subervi was at the M25 Naples, 24-02-2024, Semifinals, Clay with Dmitry Popko getting the victory 6-3 4-6 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dmitry Popko | 2 |
| Roberto Cid Subervi | 0 |
M25 Naples(24-02-2024)
6
3
4
6
6
2
| Popko | Stats | Subervi |
|---|---|---|
| 56% (15-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 62% (8-5) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 155 | Ranking | 439 |
| 155 | Highest Rank | 211 |
| 28 | Age | 31 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 27 | Titles | 14 |
| 62% (505-311) | Career Total W/L | 58% (311-223) |
| $163,780 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Krueger VS Potapova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Dmitry Popko
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
68%
(
76 of
111)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
92)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
36%
(
40 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 6-4 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 29 | Games Won | 21 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 2:44:0 | Average Match Time | 2:44:0 |
| 70% (128/184) | 1st Serve % | 65% (122/188) |
| 67% (86/128) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (78/122) |
| 52% (29/56) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (29/66) |
| 27% (6/22) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 18% (3/17) |
| 43% (81/188) | Return Points Win % | 38% (69/184) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Dmitry Popko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Dmitry Popko
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
49%
(
42 of
85)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
44%
(
33 of
75)
1st Serve %
53%
(
46 of
87)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Dmitry Popko
51%
(
40 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
87)
12
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
87)
82
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Alexis Galarneau
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Max Wiskandt
58%
(
67 of
116)
1st Serve %
56%
(
70 of
124)
10
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
7
81%
(
54 of
67)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
54 of
70)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
36 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
42 of
124)
122
Total Points Won
118
|
7-5 6-7(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Felipe Meligeni Alves
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
8
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
James Duckworth
66%
(
56 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
83)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
7
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Hugo Grenier
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
45%
(
28 of
62)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Roberto Cid Subervi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
15%
(
7 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Cannon Kingsley
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael Jodar
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
58%
(
56 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Garrett Johns
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve %
55%
(
18 of
33)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
25%
(
1 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Peter Bertran
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
20%
(
4 of
20)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Jackson Ross
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Drew Van Orderlain
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blu Baker
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
60%
(
61 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
108)
1
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
33%
(
13 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
46 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
107
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (505/311) | Win/Loss | 58% (311/223) |
| 59% (1122/783) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (701/547) |
| 53% (9528/8286) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (6075/5385) |
| 61% (151/96) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (138/88) |
| 65% (327/175) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (159/115) |
| 42% (27/38) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42% (14/19) |
| 0% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 2304 | Aces Total | 835 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 1642 | Total Double Faults | 1418 |
| 1:24:6 | Average Match Time | 1:26:40 |
| 493.32 | Average Opponent Rank | 497.79 |
| 58% (26960/46151) | 1st Serve % | 61% (17880/29165) |
| 68% (18459/26960) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (11779/17880) |
| 50% (9679/19191) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5441/11285) |
| 44% (2211/5005) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1621/3482) |
| 42% (19121/45818) | Return Points Win % | 44% (12991/29604) |
| 37% (11/19) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/7) |
| 25% (1/3) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 44% (4/5) | Cups W/L | 27% (4/11) |
| 32% (6/13) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (201/181) | Challenger W/L | 42% (82/112) |
| 76% (282/90) | Futures W/L | 71% (225/91) |
| 62% (496/801) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (303/519) |
| 50% (6/12) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (3/8) |
| 49% (101/208) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (61/135) |
| 59% (154/263) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (98/178) |
| 88% (483/425) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (293/249) |
| 12% (483/58) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (293/43) |
| 24% (333/80) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (241/61) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
